Roof insurance claims, from the homeowner’s side

This is a description of how claims generally work, not an opinion on yours. Your policy is the document that decides your claim, and your state insurance department is the authority on what your insurer is obliged to do.

In Menifee the failure that leads is sudden dry winds that test every lifted edge on the roof, and that shapes what a claim here usually looks like. These winds are not constant, which is the problem. A roof gets nine quiet months and then one night at fifty miles an hour, and whatever was marginal goes.

The sequence, start to finish

The process is: loss, evidence, mitigation, notice, inspection, scope, payment, work, final payment. Insurers are used to it and run it many times a day; the homeowner is doing it for the first and probably only time, and that asymmetry is the real difficulty rather than any individual step being hard.

It helps to think of it as a file being built rather than a decision being made. Everything you send becomes part of the file, and the file is what gets decided on — not the roof.

Evidence, before anything else

Take four times as many pictures as feel necessary and make sure the dates are intact — most phones record this automatically, and it is worth checking rather than assuming. Include something for scale in the close shots. Photograph the gutters, the vent caps and the downspouts as well as the roof itself, because soft metal records an impact more legibly than a shingle does.

Alongside the photographs, keep a plain written note of what happened and when: the date and rough time of the storm, when you first noticed the damage, who you called and what they said. A dated contemporaneous note is worth a great deal more than a recollection three months later.

Worth having in one folder before the adjuster arrives:

• Any paperwork from when the roof was last replaced or repaired
• Photographs of undamaged sections of the same roof, for comparison
• Receipts for tarps, emergency call-outs and anything else spent making it safe
• Interior photographs, including the attic and the underside of the deck
• The contractor’s written assessment, if you have had one done
• Your policy declarations page, showing the deductible and the settlement basis
• A dated written note of what happened, when, and who you spoke to

Storm-chasers, doorstep contracts, and assignment of benefits

Widespread damage brings crews from out of state within days. Some are competent and some are not, and the ones that matter are the ones who will not be reachable in three years when a workmanship problem appears. The single most useful test is not price: it is whether the company was working in this area before the storm and will be after it.

Nothing needs to be signed on a doorstep. A contractor who cannot leave a written proposal and come back tomorrow is telling you something about how the rest of the job will go.

Signals worth acting on:

• An assignment of benefits presented as routine paperwork rather than as what it is
• A request for a large payment up front, before materials are delivered or work begins
• An offer to waive, absorb, discount or rebate your deductible — this is fraud, and it is the clearest signal there is
• A contract that binds you regardless of what the insurer approves
• A refusal to put the scope in writing, itemised
• Pressure to sign anything today, or a discount that expires this afternoon
• Any offer to describe old damage as part of the new event

The things that turn a claim into a criminal matter

The straightforward test: does every document the insurer receives describe what actually happened and what was actually paid? If the answer is yes, everything is fine, including being firm and well-documented about a claim you believe is being underpaid. Pressing hard for a fair settlement is legitimate. Misdescribing the loss is not, and the difference is not a matter of degree.

There is nothing wrong with getting the most your policy actually provides. There is a great deal wrong with getting more than it provides, and the gap between those two is the entire subject.

Worth knowing before you pick up the phone

Read the declarations page. It is two or three pages, it is written in ordinary language, and it contains the deductibles, the settlement basis, the dwelling coverage limit and any endorsement that changes how roofs specifically are treated. Fifteen minutes with it removes most of the surprises described on this page.

If anything on it is unclear, the insurer is obliged to explain it, and your state insurance department will also answer questions about what a policy provision means in your state.

What an adjuster is actually looking for

Adjusters look for corroboration. Impact marks on the shingles alone are arguable; impact marks on the shingles plus dents in the gutter faces, the downspouts, the vent hoods and the air-conditioning fins tell a consistent story about one event, and consistency is what carries. This is also why the undamaged-slope photographs help you rather than hurt you: they establish a baseline.

It is entirely reasonable to be present for the inspection and to ask what they are recording. It is also reasonable to ask that your contractor be there, and many are willing to attend — that single arrangement changes more claim outcomes than anything else on this page.

What your policy actually pays: ACV, RCV and depreciation

Replacement cost, actual cash value, and recoverable depreciation are three terms worth learning before the first phone call. Replacement cost is today’s price for the work. Actual cash value is that price reduced for the years the roof has already served. Recoverable depreciation is the gap between them, which a replacement cost policy will pay once the work is done and documented, and which an actual cash value policy will not pay at all.

Some policies apply a different, harsher schedule to roofs specifically — a roof surfacing payment schedule, or a scheduled roof endorsement — which pays a declining percentage based on the roof’s age regardless of the rest of the policy. If your policy has one, it will be named on the declarations page, and it changes the arithmetic completely.

What a deductible is, and why it cannot be made to disappear

The deductible comes off every claim payment, and many policies carry a second, larger one that applies only to wind and hail. That one is often written as a percentage of the insured value of the house rather than as a flat sum, which means it can be several times the size of the ordinary deductible. On a house insured for four hundred thousand dollars, a two per cent wind-and-hail deductible is eight thousand dollars, and a great many homeowners discover this at the worst possible moment.

Check the declarations page for both figures before filing. If the likely damage is smaller than the applicable deductible, filing achieves nothing and still puts a claim on your record.

Why the argument is usually about how much of the roof

The word to know is "matching". If a repair would leave a visibly mismatched roof, some policies and some state regulations require a reasonably uniform appearance, which pushes the scope from a slope towards the whole roof. Whether that applies to you depends on your policy and your state, and it is a real question to raise rather than a trick.

Discontinued products come into it too. A shingle line that is no longer manufactured cannot be matched at any price, and that fact — evidenced, not asserted — often does more to move a scope than any argument about aesthetics.

How long all of this takes

A straightforward claim, uncontested, typically runs a few weeks from report to first payment, then however long the roofing work takes to schedule, then a further wait for the depreciation to be released after the invoice goes in. A contested one runs months. The variable is almost never the roof; it is how many rounds of scope disagreement there are.

Roofing capacity is the other timing factor and it is entirely local. After a widespread event every crew in the area is booked, and the gap between an approved claim and an available crew can be longer than the claim took.

A denial is a document, and documents can be answered

A denial has to be in writing and it has to give reasons, usually citing the specific policy provision relied on. That letter is the most useful thing in the file, because it tells you exactly what has to be answered. Read it against your policy and identify which of three things has happened: the insurer does not accept the damage exists, does not accept the cause is covered, or does not accept the amount.

Those are three different problems with three different answers, and treating a denial as one undifferentiated "no" is why so many are never successfully challenged.

The short version

Document first, make it safe second, report third, and get the scope in writing before anybody starts work. In that order it usually goes smoothly. In any other order it usually does not.